← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Hay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brockville Braves CCHL 16 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 2 19 21 0.350 0.0759 0.0759 0.2709 0.2709
2020-21 Cornwall Colts CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 CCHL 48 6 17 23 0.479 0.1039 0.1010 0.3709 0.3607
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 49 3 17 20 0.408 0.1450 0.1373 0.4286 0.4057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA GR 32 1 17 18 0.562
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 26 0 7 7 0.269
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 21 0 6 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Aurora
+146.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10855
Defenseman overall
#2277
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2016-17
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.