IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Ruh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 51 6 8 14 0.275 0.1009 0.1019 0.2897 0.2927
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 36 16 9 25 0.694 0.2551 0.2455 0.7329 0.7055
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056
2024-25 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056
2023-24 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056
2022-23 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056
2021-22 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056
2020-21 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 — — 18 10 9 19 1.056

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26875
Forward overall
#1518
Forward born in 2003
#2249
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Bottrell
Western New England · 2024-25
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Cherneski
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.