← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Crowsnest Pass Timberwolves AJHL 40 0 3 3 0.075 0.0252 0.0256 0.0695 0.0707
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 5 13 18 0.360 0.0832 0.0899
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 8 20 28 0.571 0.1321 0.1321 0.4620 0.4620
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 47 2 12 14 0.298 0.1757 0.1757 0.8777 0.8777
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA 33 1 4 5 0.151
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA 30 0 2 2 0.067
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 33 4 5 9 0.273
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 21 0 1 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2021-22 · Merrimack
-21.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5107
Defenseman overall
#1179
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2016-17
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.