IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Reimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 11 1 5 6 0.545 0.1938 0.1893 0.5727 0.5595
2023-24 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. usports 27 4 6 10 0.370 — — — —
2024-25 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. usports 17 2 3 5 0.294 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 11 4 3 7 0.636
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 35 13 31 44 1.257

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25716
Forward overall
#1450
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Costello
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Scurfield
Lawrence · 2008-09
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dillon
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.