← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Reimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-30 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Wilfrid Laurier Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 11 1 5 6 0.545 0.2004 0.1958 0.5758 0.5625
2023-24 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. USports-M 27 4 6 10 0.370 0.1954 0.2163 1.0856 1.2019
2024-25 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. USports-M 17 2 3 5 0.294 0.1552 0.1644 0.8620 0.9130
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 11 4 3 7 0.636
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA 35 13 31 44 1.257

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30334
Forward overall
#1775
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2009-10
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.