← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Hendrikson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 5 9 14 0.518 0.0639 0.0639 0.1259 0.1259
2020-21 Rosemount USHS-MN 21 9 8 17 0.809 0.0997 0.0997 0.1966 0.1966
2021-22 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 10 11 21 0.778 0.0958 0.0958 0.1889 0.1889
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 14 1 1 2 0.143 0.0508 0.0528 0.1500 0.1558
2023-24 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 47 1 12 13 0.277 0.0639 0.0630
2024-25 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 47 6 14 20 0.425 0.0983 0.0925 0.3441 0.3239
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 13 2 0 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
+101.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8810
Defenseman overall
#1999
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.