IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Kenny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Skylands Kings NA3HL 46 15 36 51 1.109 0.1226 0.1226 0.3512 0.3512
2020-21 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 39 10 18 28 0.718 0.0794 0.0794 0.2274 0.2274
2021-22 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 13 36 49 1.065 0.1178 0.1165 0.3375 0.3336
2022-23 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 32 18 31 49 1.531 0.1694 0.1598 0.5250 0.5019
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC GR 19 2 4 6 0.316
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC JR 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Alvernia
+260.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18124
Forward overall
#969
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Timpano
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Kroon
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.