IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hillier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 49 10 16 26 0.531 0.1694 0.1849 0.4107 0.4482
2022-23 South Shore Kings NCDC 50 24 25 49 0.980 0.5464 0.5843 0.3499 0.3729
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 54 19 26 45 0.833 0.3302 0.3361 0.8749 0.8905
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 56 18 52 70 1.250 0.4952 0.4781 1.3124 1.2670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Sacred Heart
-51.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6720
Forward overall
#229
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott McNulty
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.