← New Search ↗ Social Card

True Crowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Aurora Tigers OJHL 28 1 2 3 0.107 0.0263 0.0263 0.0733 0.0733
2020-21 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 17 1 6 7 0.412 0.0465 0.0465 0.1401 0.1401
2021-22 AJHL 50 3 12 15 0.300 0.1006 0.0972 0.2780 0.2685
2022-23 NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0592 0.0556 0.1750 0.1643
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 27 1 8 9 0.333
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Chatham
+81.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17722
Defenseman overall
#3061
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.