← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Rauh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 46 5 5 10 0.217 0.0729 0.0739 0.2012 0.2041
2016-17 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 17 5 3 8 0.471 0.1578 0.1524 0.4355 0.4205
2017-18 NAHL 61 8 13 21 0.344 0.1265 0.1175 0.3634 0.3377
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 27 6 5 11 0.407
2020-21 Aurora D1 NCHA JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2019-20 Aurora D1 NCHA SO 19 3 0 3 0.158
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 19 3 0 3 0.158
2018-19 Aurora D1 NCHA FR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 27 5 8 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · Aurora
+328.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40908
Forward overall
#1984
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2008-09
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.