IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Rauh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 46 5 5 10 0.217 0.0726 0.0736 0.2018 0.2047
2016-17 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 17 5 3 8 0.471 0.1572 0.1518 0.4369 0.4219
2017-18 — NAHL 61 8 13 21 0.344 0.1278 0.1188 0.3645 0.3387
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 27 6 5 11 0.407
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 19 3 0 3 0.158
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 27 5 8 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · Aurora
+326.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32519
Forward overall
#1479
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Novakovich
Hamline · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Hawkrigg
Amherst · 2008-09
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Beliveau
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.