← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Cameron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salisbury School NE-Prep 29 9 11 20 0.690 0.1366 0.1366
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 33 2 3 5 0.151 0.0894 0.0894 0.4550 0.4550
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 26 5 4 9 0.346 0.2042 0.2042 1.0398 1.0398
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 54 18 18 36 0.667 0.3933 0.3790 2.0024 1.9293
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast 21 3 4 7 0.333
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 35 6 4 10 0.286
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 35 6 4 10 0.286
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 31 9 3 12 0.387
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 31 9 3 12 0.387
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2022-23 · UMass
+60.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18573
Forward overall
#985
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.