← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Wood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 El Paso Rhinos NA3HL 45 3 12 15 0.333 0.0418 0.0406
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NA3HL 41 7 14 21 0.512 0.0643 0.0594 0.1617 0.1494
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 25 1 3 4 0.160

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16949
Defenseman overall
#3062
Defenseman born in 2003
#2784
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.