IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Corey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 20 14 34 0.667 0.4098 0.4297 1.9642 2.0596
2001-02 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 56 15 28 43 0.768 0.4720 0.4715 2.2624 2.2598
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 38 16 15 31 0.816
2004-05 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 37 17 16 33 0.892
2003-04 Hamilton D3 — SR 24 14 12 26 1.083
2003-04 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 7 9 16 0.533
2002-03 Hamilton D3 — JR 26 10 16 26 1.000
2002-03 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 8 11 19 0.633
2001-02 Hamilton D3 — SO 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2001-02 · Hamilton
+74.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7003
Forward overall
#230
Forward born in 1982
#546
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Frank DiChiara
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Baillargeon
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.