← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Corey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 20 14 34 0.667 0.3933 0.4124 2.0024 2.0997
2001-02 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 56 15 28 43 0.768 0.4530 0.4525 2.3063 2.3036
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 38 16 15 31 0.816
2004-05 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 37 17 16 33 0.892
2003-04 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 24 14 12 26 1.083
2003-04 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 7 9 16 0.533
2002-03 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 26 10 16 26 1.000
2002-03 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 8 11 19 0.633
2001-02 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2001-02 · Hamilton
+81.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7407
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 1982
#544
in USHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.