IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bernadet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 46 15 8 23 0.500 0.2788 0.2949 0.4043 0.4276
2022-23 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 12 10 22 0.407 0.1518 0.1504 0.5936 0.5880
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 21 33 54 0.900 0.3566 0.3438 0.9449 0.9111
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 19 0 1 1 0.053
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 27 1 1 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · St. Lawrence
-67.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18355
Forward overall
#932
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kenyon
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Siebold
Elmira · 2000-01
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.