← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pierson Sobush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.1113 0.1113 0.2775 0.2775
2021-22 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 46 21 16 37 0.804 0.1343 0.1433 0.3348 0.3572
2022-23 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 57 44 26 70 1.228 0.2051 0.2100 0.5113 0.5235
2023-24 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 20 21 41 0.746 0.2739 0.2742 0.7869 0.7877
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 57 24 29 53 0.930 0.3416 0.3240 0.9814 0.9309
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Lake Superior State
+28.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13441
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.