← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pierson Sobush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.0949 0.0949 0.2766 0.2766
2021-22 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 46 21 16 37 0.804 0.1145 0.1221 0.3337 0.3560
2022-23 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 57 44 26 70 1.228 0.1749 0.1791 0.5095 0.5217
2023-24 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 20 21 41 0.746 0.2648 0.2651 0.7827 0.7835
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 57 24 29 53 0.930 0.3303 0.3133 0.9762 0.9260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Lake Superior State
+32.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13261
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.