IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Price Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northern Cyclones NCDC 50 6 12 18 0.360 0.2007 0.2183 0.2911 0.3167
2018-19 — USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 — USHL 42 2 4 6 0.143 0.0878 0.0878 0.4210 0.4210
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 6 13 19 0.413 0.1636 0.1636 0.4336 0.4336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 29 0 4 4 0.138
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 24 0 7 7 0.292
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 27 4 6 10 0.370
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 30 3 7 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+60.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
98%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11914
Defenseman overall
#2102
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bob Marx
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2013-14
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Moore
Southern Maine · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.