← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bob Marx Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3713 0.3997 1.0588 1.1398
2008-09 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 55 9 10 19 0.345 0.1283 0.1318 0.3658 0.3756
2009-10 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 54 3 15 18 0.333 0.1238 0.1222 0.3529 0.3482
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 53 7 22 29 0.547 0.2032 0.1902 0.5794 0.5422
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Saint Mary's D3 SR 27 5 13 18 0.667
2013-14 Saint Mary's D3 JR 25 10 7 17 0.680
2012-13 Saint Mary's D3 SO 25 6 9 15 0.600
2011-12 Saint Mary's D3 FR 22 5 2 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2011-12 · Saint Mary's
+106.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6321
Defenseman overall
#1066
Defenseman born in 1990
#2884
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.