← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Eng Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 French River Rapids NOJHL 56 6 15 21 0.375 0.0534 0.0534 0.1556 0.1556
2020-21 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 11 3 9 12 1.091 0.1553 0.1553 0.4526 0.4526
2021-22 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 26 11 10 21 0.808 0.1150 0.1049 0.3351 0.3057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC 18 7 5 12 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2024-25 · Misericordia
+642.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29684
Forward overall
#1557
Forward born in 2001
#343
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2014-15
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.