IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taybor Aldrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 48 8 9 17 0.354 0.1258 0.1329 0.3719 0.3927
2024-25 — NAHL 53 10 9 19 0.358 0.1273 0.1278 0.3764 0.3777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE — 20 6 5 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2025-26 · Endicott
+395.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38161
Forward overall
#2376
Forward born in 2005
#3966
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Taylor
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Giacomin
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent DeNuccio
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.