IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Gulenchyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 21 6 6 12 0.571 0.1538 0.1538 0.1388 0.1388
2021-22 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 16 22 38 1.226 0.3300 0.3300 0.2977 0.2977
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 43 9 10 19 0.442 0.1277 0.1305 0.3327 0.3400
2023-24 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 6 8 14 0.241 0.0896 0.0880 0.2556 0.2510
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 10 12 22 0.458 0.1702 0.1582 0.4852 0.4511
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 26 2 1 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
3.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30478
Forward overall
#1607
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Gieseler
Adrian · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stansik
Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.