← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Gulenchyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 21 6 6 12 0.571 0.0723 0.0723 0.1388 0.1388
2021-22 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 16 22 38 1.226 0.1552 0.1552 0.2977 0.2977
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 43 9 10 19 0.442 0.1132 0.1157 0.3331 0.3404
2023-24 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 6 8 14 0.241 0.0887 0.0871 0.2548 0.2503
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 10 12 22 0.458 0.1684 0.1566 0.4837 0.4497
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 26 2 1 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+4.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37668
Forward overall
#2370
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2024-25
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.