IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Emery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 31 1 8 9 0.290 0.1067 0.1137 0.3064 0.3265
2024-25 — NAHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.0980 0.0993 0.2815 0.2852
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · St. John Fisher
+522.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44470
Forward overall
#2918
Forward born in 2005
#4940
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Bromberg
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Worre
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.