IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Wall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 44 0 6 6 0.136 0.0501 0.0524 0.1440 0.1507
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 37 8 8 16 0.432 0.1763 0.1758 0.3084 0.2998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31913
Forward overall
#1904
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Blanton
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jayson Saraceno
New England College · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler English
Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.