← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Esterbrooks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-06 Country: USA
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hermantown USHS-MN 31 5 20 25 0.806 0.1021 0.1021 0.1958 0.1958
2023-24 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 9 0 4 4 0.444 0.1633 0.1730 0.4697 0.4975
2024-25 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 8 15 23 0.451 0.1657 0.1668 0.4767 0.4799
2025-26 — NAHL 50 14 36 50 1.000 0.3674 0.3518 1.0569 1.0120
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3530
Defenseman overall
#901
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2012-13
0.27
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2021-22
0.52
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2023-24
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.