| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Westminster | NE-Prep | 26 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.346 | 0.0977 | 0.0977 | 0.1584 | 0.1584 |
| 2019-20 | Boston Jr. Bruins | NCDC | 46 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.326 | 0.1818 | 0.1818 | 0.2637 | 0.2637 |
| 2020-21 | — | NCDC | 39 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.333 | 0.1858 | 0.1858 | 0.2695 | 0.2695 |
| 2021-22 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 58 | 10 | 24 | 34 | 0.586 | 0.2323 | 0.2209 | 0.6155 | 0.5852 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | — | 37 | 5 | 23 | 28 | 0.757 |
| 2024-25 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 35 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0.686 |
| 2023-24 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | — | — | 34 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 0.441 |
| 2022-23 | Alaska Anchorage | D1 | — | — | 27 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.518 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.