← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Chen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Milton Academy NE-Prep 20 0 5 5 0.250 0.0482 0.0482 0.1144 0.1144
2022-23 Milton Academy NE-Prep 27 8 22 30 1.111 0.2143 0.2143 0.5084 0.5084
2023-24 Chippewa Steel NAHL 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0820 0.0820 0.2423 0.2423
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Williams
-44.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9899
Defenseman overall
#2163
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.