IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Mobley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 19 28 47 0.797 0.3156 0.3216 0.8364 0.8524
2019-20 — USHL 50 22 15 37 0.740 0.4549 0.4549 2.1802 2.1802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA — 34 13 7 20 0.588
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 34 12 7 19 0.559
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 33 1 4 5 0.151
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 36 0 11 11 0.306
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Clarkson
-0.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8918
Forward overall
#387
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Fink
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.