← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kennan Reyelts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Proctor USHS-MN 27 8 6 14 0.518 0.0639 0.0639 0.1259 0.1259
2020-21 Proctor USHS-MN 19 9 10 19 1.000 0.1232 0.1232 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 Proctor USHS-MN 26 24 15 39 1.500 0.1848 0.1848 0.3644 0.3644
2022-23 Niverville Nighthawks MJHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0481 0.0492 0.1575 0.1612
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NA3HL 23 9 17 26 1.130 0.1250 0.1221 0.5250 0.5196
2024-25 Colorado Grit NAHL 55 4 4 8 0.145 0.0517 0.0485 0.1528 0.1432
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · St. Scholastica
+49.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28000
Forward overall
#1627
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.