| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Proctor | USHS-MN | 27 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.518 | 0.0639 | 0.0639 | 0.1259 | 0.1259 |
| 2020-21 | Proctor | USHS-MN | 19 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 1.000 | 0.1232 | 0.1232 | 0.2429 | 0.2429 |
| 2021-22 | Proctor | USHS-MN | 26 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 1.500 | 0.1848 | 0.1848 | 0.3644 | 0.3644 |
| 2022-23 | Niverville Nighthawks | MJHL | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.0481 | 0.0492 | 0.1575 | 0.1612 |
| 2023-24 | New Mexico Ice Wolves | NA3HL | 23 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 1.130 | 0.1250 | 0.1221 | 0.5250 | 0.5196 |
| 2024-25 | Colorado Grit | NAHL | 55 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.145 | 0.0517 | 0.0485 | 0.1528 | 0.1432 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | FR | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.