← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Forrest Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey Renegades EHLP 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.0433 0.0433 0.1501 0.1501
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHLP 31 13 15 28 0.903 0.0587 0.0587 0.2034 0.2034
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 21 2 5 7 0.333 0.0488 0.0516 0.1634 0.1729
2022-23 EHL 43 11 11 22 0.512 0.0748 0.0753 0.2508 0.2523
2023-24 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 48 7 5 12 0.250 0.0613 0.0557 0.1711 0.1555
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC 14 3 1 4 0.286
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC 7 1 3 4 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2024-25 · Chatham
+950.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42804
Forward overall
#2724
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2010-11
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.