IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Rossa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 59 5 7 12 0.203 0.0784 0.0753 0.2964 0.2848
2001-02 — BCHL 58 14 12 26 0.448 0.1727 0.1564 0.6532 0.5915
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 17 1 3 4 0.235
2004-05 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 27 10 2 12 0.444
2003-04 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 26 5 2 7 0.269
2002-03 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 26 6 3 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2002-03 · St. Scholastica
+226.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40518
Forward overall
#832
Forward born in 1981
#2296
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Roepke
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.