← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Korona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 2 8 10 0.233 0.0948 0.1026 0.1870 0.2024
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 7 18 25 0.510 0.2080 0.2080 0.4101 0.4101
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 41 10 41 51 1.244 0.5071 0.5071 0.9998 0.9998
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 11 45 56 1.143 0.4660 0.4365 0.9187 0.8606
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 24 6 19 25 1.042
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 5 22 27 1.080
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 30 5 11 16 0.533
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 25 4 9 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Trinity
+100.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3674
Forward overall
#136
Forward born in 2001
#23
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.