IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Mendelson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Cornwall Colts CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Westminster NE-Prep 25 8 14 22 0.880 0.1698 0.1698 0.4027 0.4027
2022-23 — BCHL 51 11 13 24 0.471 0.1813 0.1754 0.6857 0.6634
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 50 11 15 26 0.520 0.2004 0.1847 0.7577 0.6983
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 30 5 15 20 0.667
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 20 5 1 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Hobart
+93.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28077
Forward overall
#1613
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.