IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Bill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Notre Dame Academy (Wis.) USHS-MN 1 0 2 2 2.000 0.2532 0.2532 0.4858 0.4858
2023-24 — AJHL 35 3 4 7 0.200 0.0671 0.0666 0.1851 0.1836
2024-25 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 47 5 13 18 0.383 0.1561 0.1505 0.3079 0.2968
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · Lawrence
-16.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41037
Forward overall
#2659
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Christian
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Deschamps
Rivier · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.