← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson DiNapoli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 EHL 21 3 4 7 0.333 0.0770 0.0796
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 33 2 11 13 0.394

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43438
Forward overall
#2876
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.