IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-25 Country: Canada
2020 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #194  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 — OJHL 54 1 24 25 0.463 0.1391 0.1472 0.3169 0.3353
2019-20 — USHL 42 4 23 27 0.643 0.3952 0.3952 1.8941 1.8941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 37 5 28 33 0.892
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 30 3 6 9 0.300
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 37 6 17 23 0.622
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 37 5 17 22 0.595
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2020-21 · Clarkson
-28.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2009-10
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Sanders
Elmira · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.