IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Barry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 18 8 7 15 0.833 0.0956 0.0991 0.1878 0.1947
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 48 2 13 15 0.312 0.0722 0.0755 0.1529 0.1599
2018-19 — EHL 41 11 16 27 0.658 0.1521 0.1514 0.3222 0.3207
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 10 19 29 0.707 0.1634 0.1634 0.3461 0.3461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 25 4 8 12 0.480
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 22 6 5 11 0.500
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE — 23 1 4 5 0.217
2020-21 Nichols D1 CNE FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6299
Defenseman overall
#1380
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Bell
Hamilton · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Schmidt
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dunagan
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.