IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Moxham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fresno Monsters USPHL-Premier 18 3 4 7 0.389 0.0509 0.0509 0.1320 0.1320
2021-22 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 59 15 20 35 0.593 0.1990 0.2019 0.5489 0.5568
2023-24 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 55 15 21 36 0.654 0.2195 0.2123 0.6057 0.5858
2024-25 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 21 24 45 0.804 0.2952 0.2764 0.8482 0.7941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Air Force
+16.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20182
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Metheral
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Coleman Jenkins
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.