IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bronson Hunt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 10 27 37 1.156 0.2290 0.2290 0.5268 0.5268
2024-25 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 10 19 29 0.491 0.1806 0.1785 0.5188 0.5129
2025-26 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 11 3 6 9 0.818 0.3006 0.2824 0.8636 0.8112
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 10 3 3 6 0.600

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17224
Forward overall
#900
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Faucher
Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Carballo
Endicott · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.