IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Polomsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0252 0.0252 0.0597 0.0597
2023-24 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 56 8 15 23 0.411 0.1007 0.0982 0.2811 0.2741
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 57 11 7 18 0.316 0.1122 0.1071 0.3316 0.3164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 26 5 4 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2025-26 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+290.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45618
Forward overall
#3066
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Mark
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Erlacher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.