← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eliott Mikesch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 34 2 10 12 0.353 0.1171 0.1179 0.3271 0.3292
2024-25 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 57 6 8 14 0.246 0.0973 0.0949 0.2579 0.2516
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42994
Forward overall
#2840
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2012-13
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.