| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 37 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.486 | 0.1044 | 0.1079 | 0.2382 | 0.2462 |
| 2016-17 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 45 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 0.778 | 0.1669 | 0.1649 | 0.3809 | 0.3764 |
| 2017-18 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 44 | 26 | 36 | 62 | 1.409 | 0.3024 | 0.2821 | 0.6900 | 0.6436 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SR | 26 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 0.692 |
| 2020-21 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | JR | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.500 |
| 2019-20 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SO | 25 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.840 |
| 2018-19 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | FR | 31 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.323 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.