← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Rowella Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 37 3 15 18 0.486 0.1044 0.1079 0.2382 0.2462
2016-17 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 45 19 16 35 0.778 0.1669 0.1649 0.3809 0.3764
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 26 36 62 1.409 0.3024 0.2821 0.6900 0.6436
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 7 11 18 0.692
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 25 11 10 21 0.840
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 31 5 5 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Manhattanville
+60.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18471
Forward overall
#758
Forward born in 1997
#151
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.