IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Drury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-26 Country: USA
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 South Shore Kings NCDC 45 3 9 12 0.267 0.1087 0.1192 0.2144 0.2351
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 52 3 6 9 0.173 0.0667 0.0684 0.2519 0.2584
2024-25 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 27 3 10 13 0.481 0.1769 0.1756 0.5082 0.5045
2025-26 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 57 19 32 51 0.895 0.3287 0.3101 0.9444 0.8911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21292
Forward overall
#1160
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jake LaRusso
NAHL 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Dean Schwenninger
NAHL 2021-22
1.39
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Matthew Pimental
EHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Frank Ireland
NCDC 2021-22
1.76
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Otis Goldman
Castleton · 2015-16
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.