IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Dietz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-06 Country: USA
Hamilton
Verbal NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 26 4 11 15 0.577 0.0730 0.0730 0.1401 0.1401
2023-24 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 28 7 15 22 0.786 0.0995 0.0995 0.1908 0.1908
2024-25 — NAHL 55 3 7 10 0.182 0.0668 0.0670 0.1921 0.1926
2025-26 Houston Bulls NAHL 58 3 48 51 0.879 0.3231 0.3080 0.9293 0.8859
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5346
Defenseman overall
#1343
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Anderson
0.88
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Nate Miller
0.40
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Anthony Ruberto
0.44
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Elliott Altberg
0.96
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Birmingham
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.