IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 16 2 4 6 0.375 0.0723 0.0723 0.1716 0.1716
2022-23 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 15 7 1 8 0.533 0.1029 0.1029 0.2440 0.2440
2023-24 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 30 9 14 23 0.767 0.1479 0.1479 0.3508 0.3508
2024-25 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0296 0.0282 0.0875 0.0835
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 15 0 3 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Saint Anselm
+207.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46338
Forward overall
#3132
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Jaremko
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Trail
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Parent
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.