← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth McCulloch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 49 4 6 10 0.204 0.0523 0.0523 0.1539 0.1539
2020-21 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 5 0 3 3 0.600 0.1537 0.1537 0.4523 0.4523
2021-22 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 37 10 13 23 0.622 0.1593 0.1509 0.4686 0.4438
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA 22 0 3 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Marian
+5.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39278
Forward overall
#2173
Forward born in 2001
#1008
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.