← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Grant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-29 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Westonka USHS-MN 26 17 21 38 1.462 0.3934 0.3934 0.3550 0.3550
2024-25 Minnesota Mallards NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0531 0.0611 0.1513 0.1742
2025-26 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 9 3 4 7 0.778 0.2888 0.3184 0.8235 0.9078
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2348
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.