IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 44 4 8 12 0.273 0.1609 0.1609 0.8190 0.8190
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 14 2 3 5 0.357 0.2107 0.2107 1.0725 1.0725
2021-22 — NAHL 31 3 6 9 0.290 0.1067 0.1041 0.3064 0.2991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 3 9 12 0.500
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 23 5 6 11 0.478
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 5 1 4 5 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2022-23 · Bethel
+1022.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33374
Forward overall
#1792
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Graham Padgitt
New England College · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Puccini
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.