IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Hodd-Chlebeck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 30 4 8 12 0.400 0.0506 0.0506 0.0972 0.0972
2022-23 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 11 11 22 0.710 0.0898 0.0898 0.1724 0.1724
2023-24 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 29 23 52 1.677 0.2124 0.2124 0.4074 0.4074
2024-25 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 36 19 14 33 0.917 0.1150 0.1146 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17721
Forward overall
#942
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christian La Croix
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2022-23
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.