IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Hodd-Chlebeck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 30 4 8 12 0.400 0.1077 0.1077 0.0972 0.0972
2022-23 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 11 11 22 0.710 0.1911 0.1911 0.1724 0.1724
2023-24 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 29 23 52 1.677 0.4516 0.4516 0.4074 0.4074
2024-25 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 36 19 14 33 0.917 0.1105 0.1102 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15943
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finn Bambery
Western New England · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Leslie
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.