IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Argentina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 45 5 6 11 0.244 0.1502 0.1502 0.7201 0.7201
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 45 7 12 19 0.422 0.2595 0.2595 1.2439 1.2439
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 41 14 10 24 0.585 0.2181 0.1989 0.8530 0.7780
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 34 4 6 10 0.294
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 16 2 2 4 0.250
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 24 2 3 5 0.208
2021-22 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 29 2 3 5 0.172

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25837
Forward overall
#1457
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.