← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Orono High USHS-MN 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0405 0.0422 0.0777 0.0809
2017-18 NAHL 49 1 20 21 0.429 0.1575 0.1605 0.4524 0.4611
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 56 3 36 39 0.696 0.2559 0.2494 0.7351 0.7164
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 28 3 7 10 0.357 0.2107 0.2107 1.0725 1.0725
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 35 2 12 14 0.400
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 2 19 21 0.583
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 40 3 26 29 0.725
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 35 1 18 19 0.543
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 21 2 6 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2020-21 · Colgate
+88.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5420
Defenseman overall
#1215
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.