← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Renwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 3 3 1.500 0.3843 0.4336 1.1307 1.2757
2018-19 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 42 11 16 27 0.643 0.1647 0.1773 0.4846 0.5218
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 40 3 7 10 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7509 0.7509
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 53 22 19 41 0.774 0.4563 0.4563 2.3234 2.3234
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 38 9 15 24 0.632
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 25 2 9 11 0.440
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 36 9 11 20 0.556
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 4 7 11 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2021-22 · Maine
+39.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15254
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.