IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Bloink Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-10 Country: USA
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Janesville Jets NAHL 48 4 18 22 0.458 0.1684 0.1768 0.4837 0.5077
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7834
Defenseman overall
#1098
Defenseman born in 2007
#2820
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carson Reed
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Will Hilfiker
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Broten Sabo
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
Nathan Rickey
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Landon Brownlee
Middlebury · 2022-23
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zander Allen
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Moher
Amherst · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.